Skip Navigation



Journal of Logic and Computation Advance Access published online on March 4, 2008

Journal of Logic and Computation, doi:10.1093/logcom/exm096
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levi, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author, 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original papers

Degrees of Belief

Isaac Levi

John Dewey Professor of Philosophy Emeritus, Columbia University, New York, USA.

E-mail: levi{at}columbia.edu

This article surveys various accounts of degrees of belief and the relation between degrees of belief and full belief or absolute certainty. Corresponding to each notion of degree of belief is a conception of evidential support. Three different kinds of degrees of belief and the corresponding notions of evidential support are considered: probability, evidential support in the maximizing sense and in the satisficing sense. It is argued that probability cannot be the degree of belief or evidential support in either the maximizing or satisficing sense. Reconstructions of maximizing and satisficing degree of belief are proposed, which show that they are ways of evaluating potential answers to questions that demand the inductive expansion of a state K of full belief. These reconstructions are based on an account of inductive expansion briefly summarized in the text that understands inductive expansion to be the choice of a potential answer that maximizes a weighted average of the risk of error and the value of the information acquired. Thus, maximizing this weighted average is an index of degree of evidential support in the maximizing sense. It is explained how an index of evidential support in the satisficing sense can be constructed that achieves the same result. Finally, it is argued that several so called ‘qualitative’ notions of belief other than full belief are deprived of useful application in deliberation and inquiry because they lack the relevance to inductive expansion that maximizing and satisficing evidential support (or degree of belief) has. The discussion should be of interest to students of measures of uncertainty, inductive or non-monotonic reasoning and decision making.

Keywords: Inductive expansion; full belief; credal probability; maximizing evidential support; satisficing evidential support; plain belief



References

  1. Berger J, Berliner LM. Robust Bayes and empirical Bayes analysis with epsilon-contaminated Priors. The Annals of Statistics. 14:461–486.
  2. Carnap R. Continuum of Inductive Methods. (1952) Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  3. Carnap R. Logical Foundations of Probability. (1962) 2nd edn. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  4. Carnap R. The aim of inductive logic. In: Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science—Nagel E, Suppes P, Tarski A, eds. (1962) Stanford: Stanford University Press. 305–316.
  5. Carnap R. Inductive logic and rational decisions, and a basic system of inductive logic. In: Studies in Inductive Logic—Carnap R, Jeffrey RC, eds. (1971) Berkeley: University of California Press. 1–166.
  6. Cohen LJ. The Probable and the Provable. (1977) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  7. De Finetti B. Probability,Induction and Statistics. (1972) New York: Wiley.
  8. Dempster AP. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics (1967) 38:325–339.[CrossRef][ISI]
  9. Dubois D, Prade H. Belief change and possibility theory. In: Belief Revision—Gardenfors P, ed. (1992) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 142–182.
  10. Fisher RA. Statistical Methods and Statistical Inference. (1959) 2nd edn. New York: Hafner.
  11. Foley R. The epistemology of belief and the epistemology of degrees of belief. The American Philosophical Quarterly (1992) 29:111–124.
  12. Jeffrey RC. The Logic of Decision. (1965) New York: McGraw Hill.
  13. Jeffreys H. Scientific Inference. (1951) 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Jeffreys H. Theory of Probability. (1961) 3rd edn. London: Oxford University Press.
  15. Keynes JM. A Treatise on Probability. (1921) London: MacMillan.
  16. Kyburg HE. Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. (1961) Middletown, Conn: Wesleyan University Press.
  17. Kyburg HE. The Logical Foundations of Statistical Inference. (1974) Dordrecht: Reidel.
  18. Levi I. Gambling with Truth. (1967) New York: A.Knopf. (reissued in paperback by MIT Press, 1973).
  19. Levi I. Probability kinematics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (1967) 18:197–209.[CrossRef]
  20. Levi I. Information and inference. Synthese (1969) 17:369–391. (reprinted as chapter 5 of [23]).[CrossRef]
  21. Levi I. Probability and evidence. In: Induction, Acceptance and Rational Belief—Swain M, ed. (1970) Dordrecht: Reidel. 134–156.
  22. Levi I. On indeterminate probabilities. The Journal of Philosophy (1974) 71:391–418. (reprinted with minor revisions as ch. 6 of [28]).[CrossRef]
  23. Levi I. The Enterprise of Knowledge. (1980) Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  24. Levi I. Decisions and Revisions. (1984) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Levi I. The impossibility of inductive probability. Nature (1984) 310:433.
  26. Levi I. Hard Choices. (1986) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Levi I. The Fixation of Belief and Its Undoing. (1991) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Levi I. For the Sake of the Argument. (1996) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  29. Levi I. The Covenant of Reason. (1997) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Levi I. Value commitments, value conflict and the separability of belief and value. Philosophy of Science (1999) 66:509–533.[CrossRef][ISI]
  31. Levi I. Inductive expansion and nonmonotonic reasoning. In: Frontiers in Belief Revision—Williams M-A, Rott H, eds. (2001) Dordrecht: Kluwer. 7–56.
  32. Levi I. Mild Contraction. In: Evaluating Loss of Information due to Loss of Belief. (2004) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Popper KR, Miller D. A proof of the impossibility of inductive probability. Nature (1983) 302:687–688.[CrossRef]
  34. Savage LJ. The Foundations of Statistics. (1954) New York: Wiley.
  35. Shackle GLS. Expectations in Economics. (1949) 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (2nd edn, 1952).
  36. Shackle GLS. Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs. (1961) 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (2nd edn, 1969).
  37. Spohn W. A general non-probabilistic theory of inductive reasoning. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence—Shachter RD, et al, eds. (1990) vol. 4. North Holland. 149–158.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levi, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?