Skip Navigation



Journal of Logic and Computation Advance Access published online on July 5, 2009

Journal of Logic and Computation, doi:10.1093/logcom/exp024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/6/1321    most recent
exp024v1
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sernadas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Coniglio, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author, 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original Papers

On Graph-theoretic Fibring of Logics

Amilcar Sernadas, Cristina Sernadas and Joao Rasga

Department of Mathematics, Instituto Superior Técnico, TU Lisbon and SQIG, Instituto de Telecomunicações, Lisbon, Portugal.
E-mail: acs{at}math.ist.utl.pt; css{at}math.ist.utl.pt; jfr{at}math.ist.utl.pt

Marcelo Coniglio

Department of Philosophy and CLE, State University of Campinas, Brazil.
E-mail: coniglio{at}cle.unicamp.br

Received 29 July 2008.


   Abstract

A graph-theoretic account of fibring of logics is developed, capitalizing on the interleaving characteristics of fibring at the linguistic, semantic and proof levels. Fibring of two signatures is seen as a multi-graph (m-graph) where the nodes and the m-edges include the sorts and the constructors of the signatures at hand. Fibring of two models is a multi-graph (m-graph) where the nodes and the m-edges are the values and the operations in the models, respectively. Fibring of two deductive systems is an m-graph whose nodes are language expressions and the m-edges represent the inference rules of the two original systems. The sobriety of the approach is confirmed by proving that all the fibring notions are universal constructions. This graph-theoretic view is general enough to accommodate very different fibrings of propositional based logics encompassing logics with non-deterministic semantics, logics with an algebraic semantics, logics with partial semantics and substructural logics, among others. Soundness and weak completeness are proved to be preserved under very general conditions. Strong completeness is also shown to be preserved under tighter conditions. In this setting, the collapsing problem appearing in several combinations of logic systems can be avoided.

Keywords: Fibring; graph-theoretic techniques; preservation results; combination of logics; collapsing problem


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.