Skip Navigation

Journal of Logic and Computation 1998 8(3):425-445; doi:10.1093/logcom/8.3.425
© 1998 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SINGH, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Original Articles

Applying the Mu-Calculus in Planning and Reasoning about Action

MUNINDAR P. SINGH

Department of Computer Science, Box 7534, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7534, USA. E-mail: singh{at}ncsu.edu

Planning algorithms have traditionally been geared towards achievement goals in single-agent environments. Such algorithms essentially produce plans to reach one of a specified set of states. More general approaches for planning based on temporal logic (TL) are emerging. Current approaches tend to use linear TL, and can handle sets of sequences of states. However, they assume deterministic actions with all changes effected solely by one agent. By contrast, we use a branching model of time that can express concurrent actions by multiple agents and the environment, leading to nondeterministic effects of an agent's actions. For this reason, we view plans not as sequences of actions, but as decision graphs describing the agent's actions in different situations. Thus, although we consider single-agent decision graphs, our approach is better suited to multiagent systems. We also consider an expressive formalism, which allows a wider variety of goals, including achievement and maintenance goals. Achievement corresponds to traditional planning, but maintenance is more powerful than traditional maintenance goals, and may require nonterminating plans. To formalize decision graphs requires a means to ‘alternate’ the agent's and the environment's choices. From logics of program, we introduce the prepositional mu-calculus;, which has operators for least and greatest fixpoints. We give a semantics, a fixpoint characterization, and an algorithm to compute decision graphs.

Keywords: Mu-calculus; planning; reasoning about action; temporal logic


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.