Skip Navigation

Journal of Logic and Computation 1994 4(5):679-700; doi:10.1093/logcom/4.5.679
© 1994 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHUBERT, L. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Original Articles

Explanation Closure, Action Closure and the Sandewall Test Suite for Reasoning about Change

LENHART K. SCHUBERT

Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester Rochester, NY 14627, USA. E-mail: schubert{at}cs.rochester.edu

Explanation closure (EC) axioms were previously introduced as a means of solving the frame problem. This paper provides a thorough demonstration of the power of EC combined with action closure (AC) for reasoning about dynamic worlds, by way of Sandewall's test suite of 12-or-so problems. Sandewall's problems range from the ‘Yale turkey shoot’ (and variants) to the ‘stuffy room’ problem, and are intended as a test and challenge for non-monotonic logics of action. The EC/AC-based solutions for the most part do not resort to non-monotonic reasoning at all, yet yield the intuitively warranted inferences in a direct, transparent fashion. While there are good reasons for ultimately employing non-monotonic or probabilistic logics—e.g. pervasive uncertainty and the qualification problem—this does show that the scope of monotonic methods has been underestimated. Subsidiary purposes of the paper are to clarify the intuitive status of EC axioms in relation to action effect axioms; and to show how EC, previously formulated within the situation calculus, can be applied within the framework of a temporal logic similar to Sandewall's ‘discrete fluent logic’, with some gains in clarity.

Keywords: Explanation closure,; action closure,; Sandewall test suite,; frame problem,; monotonic reasoning about change,; temporal logic.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.