Skip Navigation

Journal of Logic and Computation 1994 4(1):1-19; doi:10.1093/logcom/4.1.1
© 1994 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KÖNIG, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Original Articles

A Hypothetical Reasoning Algorithm for Linguistic Analysis

ESTHER KÖNIG

University of Stuttgart, Institute for Computational Linguistics Azenbergstrasse 12, 70174 Stuttgart 1, GermanyE-mail: esther{at}ims.uni-stuttgart.de

The Lambek calculus, an intuitionistic fragment of linear logic, has recently been rediscovered by linguists. Due to its built-in hypothetical reasoning mechanism, it allows for describing a certain range of those phenomena in natural language syntax which involve incomplete subphrases or moved constituents. Previously, it seemed unclear how to extent traditional parsing techniques in order to incorporate reasoning about incomplete phrases, without causing the undesired effect of derivational equivalences. It turned out that the Larabek calculus offers a framework to formulate equivalent but more implementation-oriented calculi where this problem does not occur. In this paper, such a theorem prover for the Lambek calculus, i.e. a parser for Lambek categorial grammars, is defined. Permutations of proof steps which would cause derivational equivalence in a purely sequential formulation do not play a role in a (pseudo-)parallel approach which is based on a lemma table or a ‘chart’. At the same time, other redundant proof search which would occur in backtracking approaches is avoided.

Keywords: Natural language parsing,; categgorial grammar


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.