Skip Navigation

Journal of Logic and Computation 1992 2(3):349-373; doi:10.1093/logcom/2.3.349
© 1992 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FITTING, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by TRUSZCZYNSKI, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Original Articles

The Pure Logic of Necessitation

MELVIN C. FITTING*, V. WIKTOR MAREK{dagger} and MIROSLAW TRUSZCZYNSKI{dagger}

*Departments of Mathematics, Computer Science and Philosophy, Graduate Center, City University of New York Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Lehman College (CUNY) Bronx, NY 10468;
{dagger}Department of Computer Science, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506-0027

In this paper we discuss the pure logic of necessitation N, a modal logic containing classical propositional calculus, with modus ponens and necessitation as inference rules, but without any axioms for manipulating modalities. We develop a theory of the logic N. We propose a sound and complete Kripke-like semantics for N and build a tableaux system for testing whether a formula is provable from a theory in the logic N. An alternative method to compute modal-free consequences of a finite theory is also given. Our main motivation to consider the logic N comes from the area of nonmonotonic reasoning. The nonmonotonic variant of N seems to be particularly useful in investigations of knowledge sets built when only partial information is available. In particular, this logic N is deeply connected with the default logic. In this paper, we apply our results to problems in nonmonotonic reasoning and we design algorithms for building the nonmonotonic consequence operator associated with N.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.