Skip Navigation


Journal of Logic and Computation Advance Access originally published online on May 30, 2007
Journal of Logic and Computation 2007 17(3):587-604; doi:10.1093/logcom/exm017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/587    most recent
exm017v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jerábek, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author, 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original Articles

On Independence of Variants of the Weak Pigeonhole Principle

Emil Jerábek

Institute of Mathematics, AS CR, Zitná 25, 115 67 Praha 1, Czech Republic. E-mail: jerabek@math.cas.cz

Received 14 August 2006.


   Abstract

The principle Formula states that no oracle circuit can compute a surjection of a onto b. We show that Formula is independent of Formula for various choices of the parameters {pi}, {Pi}, {varrho}, P. We also improve the known separation of iWPHP(PV) from Formula under cryptographic assumptions.

Keywords: Bounded arithmetic; pigeonhole principle; KPT witnessing; Boolean circuit


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.