Skip Navigation


Journal of Logic and Computation Advance Access originally published online on July 25, 2006
Journal of Logic and Computation 2006 16(4):405-422; doi:10.1093/logcom/exl001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/4/405    most recent
exl001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Metcalfe, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author, 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original Articles

Proof Theory for Casari's Comparative Logics

George Metcalfe *

University of Technology, Vienna, Austria

E-mail: metcalfe{at}logic.at

Comparative logics were introduced by Casari in the 1980s to treat aspects of comparative reasoning occurring in natural language. In this article Gentzen systems are defined for these logics by means of a special mix rule that combines calculi for various substructural logics with a hypersequent calculus for Meyer and Slaney's Abelian logic. Cut-elimination is established for all these systems, and as a consequence, a positive answer is given to an open problem on the decidability of the basic comparative logic.

Keywords: Comparative logics; substructural logics; Abelian logic; sequents; hypersequents


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.