Skip Navigation

Journal of Logic and Computation 2006 16(2):227-255; doi:10.1093/logcom/exi076
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by García-Duque, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ramos-Cabrer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Vol. 16 No. 2, © The Author, 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Original Articles

A Six-valued Logic to Reason about Uncertainty and Inconsistency in Requirements Specifications

Jorge García-Duque, Martín López-Nores, José J. Pazos-Arias, Ana Fernández-Vilas, Rebeca P. Díaz-Redondo, Alberto Gil-Solla, Yolanda Blanco-Fernández and Manuel Ramos-Cabrer

Department of Telematics Engineering, University of Vigo, Spain. Email: jgd{at}det.uvigo.es, mlnores{at}det.uvigo.es, jose{at}det.uvigo.es, avilas{at}det.uvigo.es, rebeca{at}det.uvigo.es, agil{at}det.uvigo.es, yolanda{at}det.uvigo.es, mramos{at}det.uvigo.es

The development of requirements specifications is characterized by the uncertain and changeable knowledge available about the systems to be built. This paper presents a many-valued logic that enables effective reasoning about uncertainty and inconsistency in requirements specifications, motivating the election of six truth values and the definition of a new implication connective. The adequacy of this logic to support a formal development methodology is assessed through a comparison with Belnap's four-valued logic in combination with the classical implications.


Received 8 February 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.