Skip Navigation

Journal of Logic and Computation 2003 13(5):639-688; doi:10.1093/logcom/13.5.639
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cervesato, I.
Right arrow Articles by Pfenning, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Original Article

A Linear Spine Calculus

Iliano Cervesato1 and Frank Pfenning2

1 Advanced Engineering and Sciences Division, ITT Industries, Inc., Alexandria, VA 22303, USA. E-mail: iliano{at}itd.nrl.navy.mil 2 Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. E-mail: fp{at}cs.cmu.edu

We present the spine calculus S->{multimap}&{top} as an efficient representation for the linear {lambda}-calculus {lambda}->{multimap}&{top} which includes unrestricted functions (->) linear functions ({multimap}) additive pairing (&) and additive unit ({top}). S->{multimap}&{top} enhances the representation of Church's simply typed {lambda}-calculus by enforcing extensionality and by incorporating linear constructs. This approach permits procedures such as unification to retain the efficient head access that characterizes first-order term languages without the overhead of performing {eta}-conversions at run time. Applications lie in proof search, logic programming, and logical frameworks based on linear type theories. It is also related to foundational work on term assignment calculi for presentations of the sequent calculus. We define the spine calculus, give translations of {lambda}->{multimap}&{top} into S->{multimap}&{top} and vice versa, prove their soundness and completeness with respect to typing and reductions, and show that the typable fragment of the spine calculus is strongly normalizing and admits unique canonical, i.e. ß{eta}-normal, forms.

Keywords: Linear lambda calculus, term assignment systems, uniform provability.


Received 5 February 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.