Skip Navigation

Journal of Logic and Computation 2002 12(3):345-370; doi:10.1093/logcom/12.3.345
© 2002 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Criscuolo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Serafini, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Original Article

A Foundation for Metareasoning Part II: The Model Theory

Giovanni Criscuolo1, Fausto Giunchiglia2 and Luciano Serafini3

1 Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, University of Naples, 80125 Napoli, Italy. E-mail: vanni@na.infn.it 2 Dipartimento di Informatica e Studi Aziendali, University of Trento, 38100 Trento, Italy, and ITC–IRST, Centro per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica, 38050 Trento, Italy. E-mail: fausto@itc.it 3 ITC–IRST, Centro per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica, 38050 Trento, Italy. E-mail: serafini@itc.it

OM pairs are our proposed framework for the formalization of metareasoning. OM pairs allow us to generate deductively the object theory and/or the metatheory. This is done by imposing, via appropriate reflection rules, the relation we want to hold between the object theory and the metatheory. In a previous paper we have studied the proof theoretic properties of OM pairs. In this paper we study their model theoretic properties, in particular we study the relation between the models of the metatheory and the object theory; and how to use these results to refine the previous analysis.

Keywords: Metatheory; reflection; contextual reasoning

Received 30 October 1997.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.