Skip Navigation

Journal of Logic and Computation 2001 11(2):337-354; doi:10.1093/logcom/11.2.337
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ndjatou, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Original Article

Minimizing Agent Specifications using a Logic of Knowledge and Actions

Gilbert Ndjatou1

1 Department of Computer Science, William Paterson University of New Jersey, Wayne, NJ 07470, USA. E-mail: ndjatou{at}cs.wpunj.edu

Given the specification of an agent's behaviour in terms of what it can do at every task-domain situation, we propose a mechanism to derive an equivalent specification but with fewer states that is based on Milner's ‘observation equivalence’. This is done by identifying internal states of an agent that are ‘observation equivalent’. We also introduce the notion of ‘pertinent fact’ about an agent's behaviour at an internal state as a fact that is true at all internal states of the agent that are ‘observation equivalent’ to this particular state, and also define a new logic, Propositional Logic of Knowledge and Actions (PLKA), to specify and reason about the behaviour of an agent in terms of pertinent facts. A complete axiomatization of this logic, which stands as a conservative extension of both the logic S5 of knowledge and Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL), and a characterization of an agent's behaviour in terms of ‘pertinent facts’ are also provided.

Keywords: Logic of knowledge; logic of knowledge and actions; object system; observation equivalence; procedural knowledge; propositional dynamic logic; rational behaviour; reactive systems


Received 8 August 1997.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.